By Arveent Kathirtchelvan

I found out recently, to, honestly, no real surprise, that the Malaysian Nuclear Power Corporation (MNPC) has finally been decided to be closed. This devastated me to no end, and annoyed me the same amount. I thought of all the nuclear experts I have met so far, all the PhDs, all that talent, going by the wayside due to a government with a weak constitution that doesn’t understand science or is unwilling to educate the people on the facts on radiation.

Unfortunately, this attitude continues with the lukewarm efforts to revamp our electricity generation mix with YBM Yeo Bee Yin, possibly the best performing member of the current Malaysian cabinet due to her response to plastic usage, pledging only advances in solar power so far with energy efficiency in tow (and even then this is not to replace fossil fuels but only reduce the peak load around midday). Amongst the best utility providers in the world, Tenaga Nasional, is stuck with reorienting itself to deal with this narrowed vision when it can actually be handling substantial projects in nuclear power.

Most recently, she shared that if every roof in Malaysia had solar panels installed, Malaysia would be able to generate more electricity than what we currently generate from fossil fuels. This is mind-boggling as choosing the proper electricity generating technologies to be considered for Malaysia’s energy mix has very little to do with whether something is possible. Yes, lining each roof in Malaysia with solar panels may provide this amount of power, yet the cost of such a step is not considered. Moreover, the huge inefficiencies of rooftop solar causes a lot of resource depletion and waste management problems. This is not even taking into consideration the storage needs for that level of solar penetration.

Furthermore, the animosity towards Lynas has ramped up with the Ministry of Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change (MESTECC) firstly commissioning an Executive Committee of the Operational Assessment for Lynas (LAMP) to review the plant’s operations for any non-compliance. The report from this committee essentially gave the green light for Lynas to continue operating with a few recommendations regarding permanent waste disposal. Yet the ministry decided to not follow the recommendations of the very committee they commissioned, deciding to try to force Lynas to remove their wastes from Malaysia.

Potential Pathways Forward

What has become of my country? We are languishing in economic malaise and keep making decisions to appease those who do not fully understand what is the better step to undertake. From the U-turns on the Rome Statute and ICERD to appease right-wing fearmongers to the aforementioned paradoxical stances on energy to appease supposed environmental groups that refuse to acknowledge scientific facts.

It is undeniable now that we are slowly losing out on whole industries that we could be fostering that will ensure sustainable development, sophistication of our human capital and a resilient economy. Take, for instance, nuclear power. For one, it is the only scalable electricity generating technology that is low-carbon and low-pollution whilst being affordable and the safest of all such technologies. Potentially, it can replace fossil fuel usage quite easily and keep energy security high, asking relatively lesser from the rakyat in terms of lifestyle changes.

However, possibly more importantly, it can create peripheral revenue streams and multiple levels of employment. For example, one can think about the construction of a nuclear power plant, which requires massive steel and concrete work. Other than this, fabricating the uranium fuel for the reactor is another sector, so is installation of safety equipment, regular audits of the plant, day-to-day running of the plant, monitoring power output. Moreover, one can think of the pre-construction phase with site inspection, hydrological surveys, radiation and environmental assessment. Or the end-of-life phase with decommissioning engineering and waste management. With the latter, one can go further and think about creating industries dependent on the reuse or recycling of the nuclear wastes, possibly even new reactor technology. On that matter, advanced reactor design can be furthered, as can improvements on safety and plant design, all of which can lead to monetary gain.

In the nuclear field, there is also new nuclear research to be done. One such pathway is thorium reactor design, where uranium is replaced with the more abundant thorium as fuel. Malaysia is rich in thorium, as are other third world countries like India, which lends itself to speedier development in the third world through mining and trade. Another is extracting uranium from the sea. The sea is rich in uranium and scientists currently are utilising a variety of methods to extract it to keep the uranium fuel cycle sustainable. The sea’s share of uranium is so vast that 10,000 years of the earth’s energy needs can be satisfied with it (or a whole order of magnitude higher if breeder reactors are used). Still another is developing Small Modular Reactors, molten salt reactors, the list goes on and on.

Moving away from nuclear power, what will generating all that power lead to if it is not used. In this regard, transforming our transportation sector from fossil fuels-based to electricity-based is pivotal. Unfortunately, we seem more interested in buying premium materials for this from overseas suppliers rather than creating them ourselves. For example, the metal Neodymium is necessary to create permanent magnets which are imperative in building electric motors.

We have the largest rare earths metal plant outside of China in Lynas with close to a 20% market share on Neodymium. Yet all of its products are exported. Instead of addressing that through the creation of downstream industries and diverting Lynas products to them, we are antagonising what could be the accelerant to Malaysia’s economic growth. Imagine the number of electric vehicles manufacturers who will be happy to base their manufacturing site within Malaysia with a simple change in government policy.

Silver Lining in GMOs

However, there are some possibilities looking forward on current policies. In agriculture, the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-Based Industries are in the process of drafting a new seed bill. Whilst many environmental CSOs and members of the farming community have cautioned against this bill, quite rightly pointing out issues related to private ownership of seeds causing the oppression small farmers, causing monocultures and an imposition of a monopoly of food resources held by corporate entities, one should look at the opportunities that can be created.

With a bank of superior seeds, Malaysia’s agricultural sector can be made much more efficient, occupying less land, needing less resources such as water and fertiliser and producing a greater yield of product. Malaysia still imports a lot of food for domestic consumption. This is an inherent vulnerability that can be overcome with the aforementioned seeds, given the proper assessments and solutions are found beforehand to the relevant issues raised.

Similar to seed creation, biotechnological research can be focused upon to create a sustainable revenue stream that will bolster our economy. There are a lot of products currently being made through fossil fuels which can be replaced with similar products made from microorganisms or other biological means. Products such as surfactants are indeed now being created in the United Kingdom through biological means. In this regard, genetic engineering should be focused on to create products which can then either be used locally to replace conventional ones or be exported overseas.


The pervasive theme in all of these suggestions is research and development. At the moment in Malaysia, this area is not given much focus. We are much more interested in manufacturing, primary agriculture and service, the latter so much so that Malaysia is experience premature deindustrialisation. To combat this, we must undertake proactive reindustrialisation but not in areas already explored and saturated with competitors, but new, unexplored areas that can only be spearheaded through a healthy respect for research. It is hoped that this government would realise this sooner or later. Unfortunately, with how they have acted so far, it seems political posturing is more important than the future of Malaysia.

6 thoughts on “We Are Wasting Our Potential

  1. I kind of think you’ll love this piece of news:-
    “China could build 30 Silk Road nuclear reactors by 2030”
    “Beijing needs to take full advantage of the opportunities provided by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and give more financial and policy support to its nuclear sector, senior Chinese industry official Wang Shoujun said.”
    “Going with nuclear power has already become a state strategy, and nuclear exports will help optimize our export trade and free up domestic high-end manufacturing capacity,” he said at the China People’s Political Consultative Conference.


    1. Surprisingly, we are more concerned that safety features and governance might be circumvented. If the IAEA and the UNSCEAR approves these projects, and they remain highly transparent, we will be supportive


      1. These are legitimate concerns, especially with regard to the very long-term safe storage of nuclear waste products, which can be up to 10,000 years.

        Also, whilst it’s true that modern nuclear power stations are generally very safe, however in the rare event of failure and leakage of radiation, the contamination effects can be very long term.

        It’s like air travel is said to be the safest mode of transport but when a plane crashes, most often there are no survivors, though in the case of an air crash, only those on the aircraft and sometimes those on the ground are killed or injured and that’s all but in the case of a nuclear accident, the ill effects are long lasting and may not show up until decades later.

        With regards no deaths from the Fukushima nuclear power station meltdown, there were no deaths thanks to residents in towns and areas within 20km of the plant being evacuated and only now, about eight years after the incident, have some residents been allowed to return.

        “Some residents of Okuma, the closest town to the Fukushima Daiichi plant, have today been allowed to return home. The evacuation order issued in 2011 has been lifted for the more mountainous and less inhabited western area, where around 380 of the town’s former population of 10,500 lived.”

        As for molten salt Thorium breder reactors, the experimental reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory lasted from 1965 to 1969 but there was no commercial uptake.

        India is also increasing its number of nuclear power plants.
        “India to bring 21 more reactors online by 2031”

        Today there is an experimental Thorium reactor in the Netherlands.

        China is investing in Thorium molten salt reactors.

        However, Thorium has its pros and cons, one of them being that the technology is still experimental.
        So commercial Thorium reactors are still not available.

        R&D into Thorium reactors, theoretically could be something Malaysia could invest in, instead of a third national car but does the government have the funds to do this, given that the government is strapped for funds, or claims to be strapped for funds.
        Also with regards Mahathir’s preference for coal powered electricity power stations, well coal and natural gas are resources which Malaysia has, hence they provide Malaysia with energy security, whilst uranium will have to be imported, and whilst you say Malaysia has ample thoriu resources, however commercial Thorium reactors are not availiable yet.
        And, given the current political uncertainty arising from the sex video scandal, I doubt the government will have the time to seriously study the question as to whether or not Malaysia should adopt nuclear power.


  2. Whilst I’m no expert on the noticeable effects of pollution from gas-powered electricity generation plants and have yet to hear of complaints by the Malaysian public about injurious pollution from gas-powered power stations, however this article about residents in Bristol objecting to the construction of a gas-powered power plant 80 metres from a children’s nursery may interest you.

    “Residents unite against power station plan next to Bristol inner-city nursery”
    “On Wednesday 15 May a special council meeting was held in Bristol city hall concerning the construction of a gas-fired electrical generator just 80 metres away from a nursery school in the already highly polluted inner-city area of Barton Hill.”
    “The company pushing to acquire planning permission to build this generator is Conrad Energy, and it’s no surprise that the majority of local people, and especially the parents whose children attend the nursery, are dead against its construction.”
    “Bristol’s planning authority had initially approved the plan, on the basis that there were no legal grounds for refusing it, but after a petition opposing the plant racked up 1,000 signatures in less than three days, a public hearing was suddenly deemed to be necessary. (Planning officers recommend approval of St Philip’s Marsh gas plant by Lorna Stephenson, The Bristol Cable, 8 May 2019)”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.